Roth Or Traditional IRA ... Which Is The Better Choice?

As U.S. taxpayers contemplate funding IRAs, they may wonder which type of IRA - Roth or Traditional - is the better choice. If you are one of these individuals, here is an outline of some of the differences between the two retirement accounts, their eligibility requirements and other factors to consider when choosing the account that's right for you.

Contribution Limits
The contribution limits for the Roth and Traditional IRAs are the same. For tax year 2010, for example, you could contribute up to $5,000 to your IRA, plus an additional $1,000 catch-up contribution if you reached age 50 or older by the end of the tax year.

Deductibility
One of the major factors for deciding between a Roth and Traditional IRA is your eligibility to deduct Traditional IRA contributions and in turn get a tax break for the year you make the contribution. Your eligibility to deduct Traditional IRA contributions, however, depends on whether you meet certain requirements. Contributions to Roth IRAs are never deductible (see the chapter "Contributions" in the tutorial Roth IRAs).

Contribution Age Limitations
If you want to be able to contribute to your IRA for as long as you like, you need to consider the age limits placed on IRA contributions. You may not make a participant contribution to a Traditional IRA after and for the year you reach age 70.5. For Roth IRAs, there is no age limit.

Income Limitations
One factor that determines whether a Roth or Traditional IRA is better for you is your income, which dictates your eligibility to contribute to a Roth IRA. If your income exceeds the limit, you may not contribute to a Roth IRA. In addition, your Roth IRA contribution limit may be lowered if your income falls within certain ranges (between a certain amount and the income limits listed above). Consult with your tax advisor to determine the maximum amount you may contribution to a Roth IRA.(For more on this subject, see our tutorial on Roth IRAs.)

Income caps do not apply to Traditional IRA contributions.

Required Minimum Distributions
If you don't ever want to be required to start distributing your retirement assets at any time, you need to consider the IRA rules for required minimum distributions (RMD). With a Traditional IRA, you must begin to take RMDs by April 1 of the year following the year you reach age 70.5. This means you must gradually reduce your IRA balance and add the distributed amount to your income, even if you are not in need of the funds.
Roth IRA owners are not subjected to RMD rules.

Tax Treatment of Distributions
The tax treatment of distributions is a big factor that determines whether the Roth or Traditional IRA is better for you. Generally, distributions from a Traditional IRA are treated as ordinary income and may be subject to income taxes; furthermore, the distributed amount may be subjected to early-distribution penalties if the amount is withdrawn while the taxpayer is under the age of 59.5.

On the other hand, qualified Roth IRA distributions are tax and penalty free. Roth IRA distributions are qualified if they meet the following two requirements:


The distributions are taken no earlier than five years after the taxpayer funds his or her first Roth IRA. This five-year period begins with the tax year for which the first contribution is made.
The distribution is taken as a result of any one of the following:
•You have reached age 59.5.
•You are disabled.
•Your beneficiary receives the distribution upon your death.
•You purchase a first home (subject to a lifetime limit of $10,000).
From a general tax perspective, the Roth IRA is the better choice if your tax rate during retirement will not be lower than your current tax rate, as the Roth IRA allows you to pay the taxes now, and receive tax-free distributions when your income tax rate is higher. If your tax rate will be lower during retirement, then the Traditional IRA may be the better choice if you are eligible to receive a tax deduction now when your tax rate is higher.

Your financial planner will help you determine whether there are other factors to consider that would make either IRA more suitable for your tax-related financial planning needs.

Splitting Your Contribution
If you are eligible to contribute to both types of IRAs, you might want to divide your contributions between your Roth and Traditional IRA; however, your total contribution to both IRAs still must not exceed the limit for that tax year (plus the catch-up contribution).

If you decide to split your contributions between both types of IRAs, you may choose to contribute the deductible amount to your Traditional IRA (see Traditional IRA Deductibility Limits) and the balance to your Roth IRA.

Before splitting your IRAs, however, consider additional fees, such as maintenance fees charged by your IRA custodian/trustee for maintaining two separate IRAs. Note also that placing bulk trades into one IRA instead of placing separate trades in separate IRAs could help you save on trade-related fees. Finally, consider the short-term benefits as well as the long-term benefits and decide which outweighs the other.

Deciding Which Is Better
For some taxpayers, their eligibility to deduct Traditional IRA contributions is the main deciding factor in choosing between a Roth and Traditional IRA. However, being eligible to deduct your contribution does not mean that the Traditional IRA is your better choice. Consider whether the benefits of the Roth IRA - such as freedom from the RMD rules and taxes, and penalty-free distributions - outweigh the benefits of a deduction.

You may contribute to a Traditional IRA and elect not to claim the tax deduction even though you are eligible to do so. The benefit of not taking a deduction is that the distribution of the equivalent amount is tax and penalty free - like the distributions of the Roth IRA. The earnings distributed from the Traditional IRA, however, will be treated as taxable income, whereas qualified distributions of earnings from a Roth IRA are tax free.

Finally, you may split your contribution between both types of IRAs and enjoy the benefits of both.

Be sure to consult with your tax professional, as there are usually other factors that could determine which options are most suitable to meet your financial needs.

Stock-Picking Strategies: Income Investing

Income investing, which aims to pick companies that provide a steady stream of income, is perhaps one of the most straightforward stock-picking strategies. When investors think of steady income they commonly think of fixed-income securities such as bonds. However, stocks can also provide a steady income by paying a solid dividend. Here we look at the strategy that focuses on finding these kinds of stocks.

Who Pays Dividends?
Income investors usually end up focusing on older, more established firms, which have reached a certain size and are no longer able to sustain higher levels of growth. These companies generally no longer are in rapidly expanding industries and so instead of reinvesting retained earnings into themselves (as many high-flying growth companies do), mature firms tend to pay out retained earnings as dividends as a way to provide a return to their shareholders.

Thus, dividends are more prominent in certain industries. Utility companies, for example, have historically paid a fairly decent dividend, and this trend should continue in the future. (For more on the resurgence of dividends following the tech boom, see How Dividends Work For Investors.)

Dividend Yield
Income investing is not simply about investing in companies with the highest dividends (in dollar figures). The more important gauge is the dividend yield, calculated by dividing the annual dividend per share by share price. This measures the actual return that a dividend gives the owner of the stock. For example, a company with a share price of $100 and a dividend of $6 per share has a 6% dividend yield, or 6% return from dividends. The average dividend yield for companies in the S&P 500 is 2-3%.

But income investors demand a much higher yield than 2-3%. Most are looking for a minimum 5-6% yield, which on a $1-million investment would produce an income (before taxes) of $50,000-$60,000. The driving principle behind this strategy is probably becoming pretty clear: find good companies with sustainable high dividend yields to receive a steady and predictable stream of money over the long term.

Another factor to consider with the dividend yield is a company's past dividend policy. Income investors must determine whether a prospective company can continue with its dividends. If a company has recently increased its dividend, be sure to analyze that decision. A large increase, say from 1.5% to 6%, over a short period such as a year or two, may turn out to be over-optimistic and unsustainable into the future. The longer the company has been paying a good dividend, the more likely it will continue to do so in the future. Companies that have had steady dividends over the past five, 10, 15, or even 50 years are likely to continue the trend.

An Example
There are many good companies that pay great dividends and also grow at a respectable rate. Perhaps the best example of this is Johnson & Johnson. From 1963 to 2004, Johnson & Johnson has increased its dividend every year. In fact, if you bought the stock in 1963 the dividend yield on your initial shares would have grown approximately 12% annually. Thirty years later, your earnings from dividends alone would have rendered a 48% annual return on your initial shares!

Here is a chart of Johnson & Johnson's share price (adjusted for splits and dividend payments), which demonstrates the power of the combination of dividend yield and company appreciation:



This chart should address the concerns of those who simply dismiss income investing as an extremely defensive and conservative investment style. When an initial investment appreciates over 225 times - including dividends - in about 20 years, that may be about as "sexy" as it gets.




Dividends Are Not Everything
You should never invest solely on the basis of dividends. Keep in mind that high dividends don't automatically indicate a good company. Because they are paid out of a company's net income, higher dividends will result in a lower retained earnings. Problems arise when the income that would have been better re-invested into the company goes to high dividends instead.

The income investing strategy is about more than using a stock screener to find the companies with the highest dividend yield. Because these yields are only worth something if they are sustainable, income investors must be sure to analyze their companies carefully, buying only ones that have good fundamentals. Like all other strategies discussed in this tutorial, the income investing strategy has no set formula for finding a good company. To determine the sustainability of dividends by means of fundamental analysis, each individual investor must use his or her own interpretive skills and personal judgment - for this reason, we won't get into what defines a "good company".

Stock Picking, not Fixed Income
Something to remember is that dividends do not equal lower risk. The risk associated with any equity security still applies to those with high dividend yields, although the risk can be minimized by picking solid companies.

Taxes Taxes Taxes
One final important note: in most countries and states/provinces, dividend payments are taxed at the same rate as your wages. As such, these payments tend to be taxed higher than capital gains, which is a factor that reduces your overall return.

How to avoid taxes with an IRA

I just learned something AWESOME, maybe you already know this, but I had a question about taxes and trading profits in a Roth IRA.

My question was if you trade stocks in a Roth IRA and do not withdraw the profits but re-invest them are they taxed? Well here is the answer:


One of the most common and 100% IRS-approved ways for the active trader to avoid taxes is to trade within an IRA. Please note, I am not a CPA or Tax Advisor. These are simply a few observations from one trader to another (or would-be trader). Consult directly with your tax advisor prior to taking any action in regards to the following. All the same, this should serve as an introduction into how traders can trade tax free within an IRA structure.

Short term gains which are what are produced by active trading are taxed at your regular tax rate. Long term gains on investments held for one year or more are taxed at 20%. However, if you actively trade within your IRA, not only are ALL taxes deferred, you don't have to report any gains or losses. The reason being there is no tax effect on the gains/losses so the IRS doesn't care what happens.

A Roth IRA is an even better vehicle for active traders to trade within. Profits made within the Roth IRA structure are never required by the IRS to be reported. Besides, gains are never taxed if the rules are followed. Basically, you need to hold the Roth for a minimum of 5 years and be over 59 1/2 to withdrawal 100% tax free.

Many traders believe that one can only trade on the long side within an IRA. This isn't true. Short selling is permitted under certain guidelines. In addition your IRA can be traded on margin to magnify the gains.

The IRS may be the trader's nemesis, but knowledge of the beast will mitigate the harm in a completely legal and ethical manner.

Dave Goodboy is Vice President of Marketing for a New York City based multi-strategy fund.
That is great news, now I know that I can trade in my Roth IRA and not worry about taxes WOOHOO!